El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
El Salvador
21.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
20.7%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
14th
Mongolia rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 21.7% against 20.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 28 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.5% | 25.2% | 0.7% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 23.7% | 24.7% | 1.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- El Salvador, at 21.7% against 20.7% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 1.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- El Salvador ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population