Peru vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
28.1%
in 2022
Serbia
27.3%
in 2022
Peru rank
2nd
Serbia rank
3rd
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 28.1% against 27.3% in Serbia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 3rd of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.6% | 17.2% | 7.4% | Peru |
| 2020s | 30.1% | 31.3% | 1.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 28.1% against 27.3% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.8%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 3rd of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population