Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Mongolia
19.0%
in 2020
Poland
17.9%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
21st
Poland rank
23rd
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.0% against 17.9% in Poland, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 21st and Poland ranks 23rd of 28 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.3% | 13.5% | 8.7% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 22.9% | 18.3% | 4.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 19.0% against 17.9% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Mongolia and Poland?
- 1.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Mongolia ranks 21st and Poland ranks 23rd of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population