Ecuador vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
47.2%
in 2022
Serbia
27.3%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
1st
Serbia rank
3rd
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 47.2% against 27.3% in Serbia, a difference of 19.9%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.7 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 3rd of 28 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.9% | 17.3% | 6.6% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 34.2% | 31.3% | 2.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 47.2% against 27.3% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 19.9%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 3rd of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population