Peru vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Peru
21.2%
in 2022
Poland
22.4%
in 2019
Peru rank
4th
Poland rank
3rd
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Peru
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 22.4% against 21.2% in Peru, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.3% | 20.5% | 0.8% | Peru |
| 2010s | 20.6% | 21.0% | 0.4% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private, Peru or Poland?
- Poland, at 22.4% against 21.2% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private between Peru and Poland?
- 1.2%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Peru ranks 4th and Poland ranks 3rd of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population