Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
24.1%
in 2020
Poland
23.3%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
2nd
Poland rank
4th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 24.1% against 23.3% in Poland, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Mongolia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 30 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 20.6% | 2.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 19.4% | 20.7% | 1.3% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 24.1% against 23.3% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population