Belarus vs El Salvador: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Belarus
19.5%
in 2019
El Salvador
19.6%
in 2022
Belarus rank
17th
El Salvador rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 19.6% against 19.5% in Belarus, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
Belarus ranks 17th and El Salvador ranks 16th of 30 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 21.3% | 2.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 19.9% | 20.7% | 0.7% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private, Belarus or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 19.6% against 19.5% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 0.1%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Belarus ranks 17th and El Salvador ranks 16th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population