Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Dominican Republic
18.3%
in 2021
Serbia
18.4%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
21st
Serbia rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 18.4% against 18.3% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 21st and Serbia ranks 20th of 39 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4% | 19.8% | 2.4% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 18.4% | 18.3% | 0.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 18.3% | 18.3% | 0.1% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 18.4% against 18.3% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Dominican Republic ranks 21st and Serbia ranks 20th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population