Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Kyrgyzstan
21.3%
in 2020
South Africa
22.9%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
South Africa rank
2nd
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 22.9% against 21.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.7% | 22.5% | 0.8% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 21.3% | 21.9% | 0.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 22.9% against 21.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 1.6%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and South Africa ranks 2nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population