Peru vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
25.3%
in 2022
South Africa
28.0%
in 2021
Peru rank
2nd
South Africa rank
1st
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 28.0% against 25.3% in Peru, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 28 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.1% | 21.4% | 2.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 16.2% | 27.5% | 11.3% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 28.0% against 25.3% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Peru and South Africa?
- 2.7%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population