Peru vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
19.7%
in 2022
Poland
20.0%
in 2019
Peru rank
16th
Poland rank
14th
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 20.0% against 19.7% in Peru, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 16th and Poland ranks 14th of 28 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.0% | 18.9% | 4.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 20.6% | 18.9% | 1.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Peru or Poland?
- Poland, at 20.0% against 19.7% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Peru and Poland?
- 0.3%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 16th and Poland ranks 14th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population