Ecuador vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
7.4%
in 2022
Serbia
7.4%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
28th
Serbia rank
27th
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 7.4% against 7.4% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 27th of 28 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.1% | 16.6% | 8.5% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 18.4% | 11.1% | 7.2% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 7.4% against 7.4% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0.0%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 27th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population