Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Chile
19.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
19.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
18th
Kyrgyzstan rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 19.6% against 19.4% in Chile, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.2% | 20.2% | 1.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 22.6% | 19.6% | 3.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 19.6% against 19.4% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Chile ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 16th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population