Dominican Republic vs Paraguay: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Dominican Republic
22.0%
in 2021
Paraguay
22.9%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
2nd
Paraguay rank
1st
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Dominican Republic
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 22.9% against 22.0% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Paraguay ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 2nd and Paraguay ranks 1st of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.5% | 21.0% | 0.5% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 21.0% | 21.0% | 0.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 22.0% | 20.9% | 1.1% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Dominican Republic or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 22.9% against 22.0% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Dominican Republic and Paraguay?
- 0.9%, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Paraguay?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Paraguay rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Dominican Republic ranks 2nd and Paraguay ranks 1st of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population