Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Mongolia
19.5%
in 2020
Viet Nam
18.6%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
17th
Viet Nam rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 19.5% against 18.6% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 17th and Viet Nam ranks 20th of 33 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.5% | 18.0% | 2.4% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 19.5% | 18.6% | 0.9% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Mongolia, at 19.5% against 18.6% in Viet Nam as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 0.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Mongolia ranks 17th and Viet Nam ranks 20th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population