Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Kyrgyzstan
28.2%
in 2020
South Africa
28.6%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
South Africa rank
5th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 28.6% against 28.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 5th of 30 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.7% | 28.5% | 0.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 28.2% | 27.3% | 0.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 28.6% against 28.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 0.4%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and South Africa ranks 5th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population