Armenia vs Chile: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash
Armenia
25.0%
in 2022
Chile
26.9%
in 2022
Armenia rank
9th
Chile rank
8th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 26.9% against 25.0% in Armenia, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Armenia ranks 9th and Chile ranks 8th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.0% | 24.7% | 3.7% | Chile |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 24.7% | 0.3% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 23.4% | 25.6% | 2.2% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash, Armenia or Chile?
- Chile, at 26.9% against 25.0% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash between Armenia and Chile?
- 1.9%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - unconditional cash?
- Armenia ranks 9th and Chile ranks 8th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population