Peru vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Social Pensions
Peru
24.7%
in 2022
Serbia
24.2%
in 2022
Peru rank
7th
Serbia rank
9th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Social Pensions over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 24.7% against 24.2% in Serbia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 9th of 25 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.1% | 22.6% | 3.5% | Peru |
| 2020s | 24.7% | 23.0% | 1.6% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - social pensions, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 24.7% against 24.2% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - social pensions between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - social pensions?
- Peru ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 9th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Social Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population