Paraguay vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Social Pensions
Paraguay
23.4%
in 2022
Serbia
24.2%
in 2022
Paraguay rank
12th
Serbia rank
9th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Social Pensions over time
- Paraguay
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 24.2% against 23.4% in Paraguay, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 9th of 25 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.3% | 22.6% | 2.7% | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 25.7% | 23.0% | 2.6% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - social pensions, Paraguay or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 24.2% against 23.4% in Paraguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - social pensions between Paraguay and Serbia?
- 0.8%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Paraguay and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - social pensions?
- Paraguay ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 9th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Social Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population