Peru vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
8.3%
in 2022
Serbia
13.7%
in 2022
Peru rank
27th
Serbia rank
24th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 13.7% against 8.3% in Peru, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.7 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 27th and Serbia ranks 24th of 28 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.3% | 19.6% | 8.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 10.4% | 11.1% | 0.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 13.7% against 8.3% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Peru and Serbia?
- 5.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 27th and Serbia ranks 24th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population