Peru vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
8.3%
in 2022
Poland
13.7%
in 2019
Peru rank
27th
Poland rank
25th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 13.7% against 8.3% in Peru, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.7 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Peru ranks 27th and Poland ranks 25th of 28 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.3% | 20.6% | 16.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 10.6% | 18.8% | 8.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Peru or Poland?
- Poland, at 13.7% against 8.3% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Peru and Poland?
- 5.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 27th and Poland ranks 25th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population