Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Mongolia
14.1%
in 2020
Viet Nam
15.1%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
23rd
Viet Nam rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 15.1% against 14.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 23rd and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 28 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.4% | 12.7% | 3.2% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 14.1% | 15.1% | 1.0% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 15.1% against 14.1% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 1.0%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Mongolia ranks 23rd and Viet Nam ranks 21st of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population