Ecuador vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
5.8%
in 2022
Poland
13.7%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
28th
Poland rank
25th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 13.7% against 5.8% in Ecuador, a difference of 7.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 2.4 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 28th and Poland ranks 25th of 28 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.2% | 17.8% | 4.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 16.6% | 18.8% | 2.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Poland?
- Poland, at 13.7% against 5.8% in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Poland?
- 7.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 28th and Poland ranks 25th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population