Dominican Republic vs Honduras: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Dominican Republic
17.6%
in 2021
Honduras
16.6%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
13th
Honduras rank
14th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Honduras
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 17.6% against 16.6% in Honduras, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Honduras ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Honduras ranks 14th of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.5% | 21.1% | 6.6% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 17.1% | 16.8% | 0.3% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Dominican Republic or Honduras?
- Dominican Republic, at 17.6% against 16.6% in Honduras as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 1.0%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Honduras?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Honduras rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 13th and Honduras ranks 14th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population