Paraguay vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Paraguay
22.1%
in 2022
Poland
20.4%
in 2019
Paraguay rank
4th
Poland rank
7th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Paraguay
- Poland
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 22.1% against 20.4% in Poland, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 4th and Poland ranks 7th of 28 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.3% | 23.1% | 0.2% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 23.0% | 19.5% | 3.5% | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Paraguay or Poland?
- Paraguay, at 22.1% against 20.4% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Paraguay and Poland?
- 1.7%, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Paraguay and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Paraguay ranks 4th and Poland ranks 7th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population