Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Mongolia
11.4%
in 2020
Peru
14.3%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
26th
Peru rank
23rd
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 14.3% against 11.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 26th and Peru ranks 23rd of 28 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.6% | 12.5% | 10.1% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 10.9% | 13.5% | 2.7% | Peru |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 14.8% | 3.4% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 14.3% against 11.4% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Mongolia and Peru?
- 2.9%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Mongolia ranks 26th and Peru ranks 23rd of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population