Georgia vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Georgia
18.1%
in 2021
Serbia
18.0%
in 2022
Georgia rank
13th
Serbia rank
14th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 18.1% against 18.0% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 14th of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.8% | 17.8% | 1.9% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 18.1% | 12.7% | 5.4% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 18.1% against 18.0% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Georgia ranks 13th and Serbia ranks 14th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population