Ecuador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Ecuador
9.2%
in 2022
Mongolia
11.4%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
28th
Mongolia rank
26th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 11.4% against 9.2% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 28th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 28 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.5% | 10.9% | 7.6% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 14.3% | 11.4% | 2.8% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 11.4% against 9.2% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 2.2%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Ecuador ranks 28th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population