Armenia vs Chile: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
15.7%
in 2022
Chile
15.6%
in 2022
Armenia rank
21st
Chile rank
22nd
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 15.7% against 15.6% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 21st and Chile ranks 22nd of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.1% | 13.7% | 7.4% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 17.0% | 18.0% | 1.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Chile?
- Armenia, at 15.7% against 15.6% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Chile?
- 0.1%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 21st and Chile ranks 22nd of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population