Peru vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Peru
8.7%
in 2022
Serbia
9.6%
in 2022
Peru rank
27th
Serbia rank
26th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 9.6% against 8.7% in Peru, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 27th and Serbia ranks 26th of 28 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.2% | 19.3% | 8.1% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 10.7% | 9.8% | 0.8% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Peru or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 9.6% against 8.7% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.9%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Peru ranks 27th and Serbia ranks 26th of 28 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population