Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
17.7%
in 2020
Poland
17.3%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
25th
Poland rank
28th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 17.7% against 17.3% in Poland, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 25th and Poland ranks 28th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.4% | 18.9% | 0.5% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 18.6% | 19.1% | 0.6% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 17.7% against 17.3% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.4%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 25th and Poland ranks 28th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population