Peru vs Romania: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Peru
20.1%
in 2022
Romania
20.2%
in 2021
Peru rank
16th
Romania rank
15th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Peru
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 20.2% against 20.1% in Peru, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Romania ahead.
Peru ranks 16th and Romania ranks 15th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.4% | 19.3% | 1.9% | Romania |
| 2010s | 18.9% | 16.7% | 2.2% | Peru |
| 2020s | 17.3% | 20.1% | 2.8% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private, Peru or Romania?
- Romania, at 20.2% against 20.1% in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private between Peru and Romania?
- 0.1%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Romania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Peru and Romania rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Peru ranks 16th and Romania ranks 15th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population