Mongolia vs Uruguay: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
16.1%
in 2020
Uruguay
12.5%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
27th
Uruguay rank
30th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 16.1% against 12.5% in Uruguay, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 30th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.6% | 21.3% | 0.3% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 17.8% | 23.7% | 5.9% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 16.1% | 27.7% | 11.6% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Mongolia, at 16.1% against 12.5% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 3.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 30th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population