Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Mongolia
16.1%
in 2020
Poland
18.1%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
27th
Poland rank
24th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 18.1% against 16.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 27th and Poland ranks 24th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.5% | 19.1% | 1.4% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 17.6% | 19.0% | 1.4% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 18.1% against 16.1% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private between Mongolia and Poland?
- 2.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Mongolia ranks 27th and Poland ranks 24th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population