Belarus vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Belarus
19.9%
in 2019
Peru
20.1%
in 2022
Belarus rank
17th
Peru rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Belarus
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 20.1% against 19.9% in Belarus, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 17th and Peru ranks 16th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2% | 18.6% | 0.6% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 19.2% | 0.7% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private, Belarus or Peru?
- Peru, at 20.1% against 19.9% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private between Belarus and Peru?
- 0.2%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Belarus ranks 17th and Peru ranks 16th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population