Armenia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private
Armenia
16.7%
in 2022
Poland
18.1%
in 2019
Armenia rank
25th
Poland rank
24th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 18.1% against 16.7% in Armenia, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Armenia ranks 25th and Poland ranks 24th of 30 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.1% | 19.3% | 8.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 18.8% | 5.9% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 18.1% against 16.7% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private between Armenia and Poland?
- 1.4%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private?
- Armenia ranks 25th and Poland ranks 24th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population