Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Mongolia
19.8%
in 2020
Poland
19.8%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
14th
Poland rank
13th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 19.8% against 19.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 14th and Poland ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.0% | 19.4% | 0.6% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 21.9% | 19.8% | 2.1% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 19.8% against 19.8% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Mongolia ranks 14th and Poland ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population