El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
El Salvador
17.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
23.6%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
29th
Mongolia rank
26th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 23.6% against 17.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 5.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 30 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.9% | 22.5% | 34.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 20.8% | 27.4% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 23.6% against 17.7% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 5.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- El Salvador ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population