Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Chile
34.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
34.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 34.6% against 34.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 30 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.5% | 42.2% | 22.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 28.5% | 34.9% | 6.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 28.6% | 34.6% | 6.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 34.6% against 34.2% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.4%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Chile ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population