Belarus vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
32.8%
in 2019
South Africa
29.4%
in 2021
Belarus rank
17th
South Africa rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- South Africa
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 32.8% against 29.4% in South Africa, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Belarus ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 20th of 30 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or South Africa?
- Belarus, at 32.8% against 29.4% in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and South Africa?
- 3.4%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 20th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population