Belarus vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
31.7%
in 2019
South Africa
33.9%
in 2021
Belarus rank
19th
South Africa rank
17th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 33.9% against 31.7% in Belarus, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 17th of 29 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 33.9% against 31.7% in Belarus as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and South Africa?
- 2.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 17th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population