Armenia vs Chile: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
36.0%
in 2022
Chile
34.4%
in 2022
Armenia rank
15th
Chile rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 36.0% against 34.4% in Chile, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 15th and Chile ranks 16th of 29 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.7% | 29.2% | 10.5% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 37.8% | 29.2% | 8.5% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 37.0% | 31.8% | 5.3% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Chile?
- Armenia, at 36.0% against 34.4% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Chile?
- 1.6%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 15th and Chile ranks 16th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population