Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Argentina
45.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
42.6%
in 2020
Argentina rank
10th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 45.3% against 42.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 29 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.0% | 44.3% | 6.6% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 35.5% | 42.6% | 7.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Argentina, at 45.3% against 42.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.7%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population