Argentina vs Georgia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Argentina
45.3%
in 2022
Georgia
48.2%
in 2021
Argentina rank
10th
Georgia rank
8th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Argentina
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 48.2% against 45.3% in Argentina, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Georgia ranks 8th of 29 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 51.0% | 50.0% | 1.0% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 40.9% | 45.8% | 5.0% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Argentina or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 48.2% against 45.3% in Argentina as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Argentina and Georgia?
- 2.9%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Georgia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Argentina and Georgia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Georgia ranks 8th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population