Mongolia vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Mongolia
23.7%
in 2020
South Africa
23.4%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
19th
South Africa rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Mongolia
- South Africa
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 23.7% against 23.4% in South Africa, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 20th of 27 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.0% | 24.7% | 2.7% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 23.7% | 23.7% | 0.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Mongolia or South Africa?
- Mongolia, at 23.7% against 23.4% in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Mongolia and South Africa?
- 0.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Mongolia ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 20th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population