Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Mongolia
23.7%
in 2020
Poland
26.4%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
19th
Poland rank
17th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 26.4% against 23.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 19th and Poland ranks 17th of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.5% | 36.7% | 14.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 39.7% | 19.0% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 26.4% against 23.7% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Mongolia and Poland?
- 2.7%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Mongolia ranks 19th and Poland ranks 17th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population