Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Kyrgyzstan
31.3%
in 2020
Poland
26.4%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Poland rank
17th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 31.3% against 26.4% in Poland, a difference of 4.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Poland ranks 17th of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.9% | 35.8% | 0.8% | Poland |
| 2010s | 34.9% | 36.9% | 2.0% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 31.3% against 26.4% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 4.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Poland ranks 17th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population