Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Kazakhstan
36.2%
in 2021
Serbia
49.7%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Serbia rank
4th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 49.7% against 36.2% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 13.5%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.4 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.4% | 31.6% | 26.8% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 38.5% | 43.2% | 4.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 36.2% | 43.5% | 7.3% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 49.7% against 36.2% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 13.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population