Indonesia vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Indonesia
24.1%
in 2022
South Africa
23.4%
in 2021
Indonesia rank
18th
South Africa rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Indonesia
- South Africa
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 24.1% against 23.4% in South Africa, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 18th and South Africa ranks 20th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.7% | 24.7% | 3.0% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 22.0% | 23.5% | 1.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Indonesia or South Africa?
- Indonesia, at 24.1% against 23.4% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Indonesia and South Africa?
- 0.7%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Indonesia and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Indonesia ranks 18th and South Africa ranks 20th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population