Georgia vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Georgia
37.8%
in 2021
Serbia
49.7%
in 2022
Georgia rank
6th
Serbia rank
4th
Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 49.7% against 37.8% in Georgia, a difference of 11.9%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Serbia ahead.
Georgia ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.8% | 47.1% | 5.4% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 37.8% | 43.5% | 5.7% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 49.7% against 37.8% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Georgia and Serbia?
- 11.9%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 6th and Serbia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population